ZeroSum Ruler (home)

Blogging on math education and other related things

The Math Book by Clifford Pickover is awesome! July 11, 2012

“Have you read The Math Book?”

-

“Which math book?”

-

The Math Book?”

-

“Umm, ??”

-

“There’s a The Science Book, too!”

-

#*%^&!!!!!

-

No really!  There IS a book called The Math Book  and it’s by the fascinating and mind-boggling book-producing author Clifford A. Pickover, who you can even follow on Twitter

-

Before I was introduced to this book, I would have been the red converser in the above dialogue.  I mean, surely the title The Math Book was taken back in the stone ages.  How could there possibly also be a The Science Book (and a The Physics Book and a The Medical Book, etc.) in modern times?

-

I’m not sure how it happened, just that it happened and that it’s awesome.  The Math Book was published in 2009 and has a cooler format than just about any other math book I have ever cracked open (possibly tied with Glencoe’s high school math textbooks, but those are textbooks so are in a different category altogether) and certainly cooler than any other book about math I have ever read.  As you turn each page, you are surprised by yet another full-page picture relating to the previous page’s concise summary of some even stranger mathematical topic.   Here we can see the page on Zeno’s Paradox, a mathematical problem that has plagued mathematicians for centuries.  Did you know that Math states you’ll never make it out of your bedroom door?  If you get up to leave (dinner’s ready!), at some point you’ll be halfway between your computer chair and the door.  At some point later you will be halfway between the halfway point and the door.  You journey to the door is marked by an endless series of halfway points, and you can always take half of whatever distance you have left to travel (think the molecular level… and beyond).  Hope you stashed snacks!

-

-

Ant stride lengths, cicada life cycles, spirals, knots and Murphy’s Law (doh!), fractals as used in animation, Cryptography, magic squares, slide rules, imaginary numbers, Möbius strips, Zero, monkeys typing on keyboards, monsters!, and dimensions far past our comfortable 3 are just some of the many topics, broken down by year, surveyed in this wonderful book.  If you’re a math teacher of students who often ask for extra credit, this book is a great jump-off.  The kids can look through the book for something that catches their fancy and do additional research until their heart’s – and page number requirement’s - content.   This is a truly awesome book for all ages.

-

contact blog author Shana Donohue: shanadonohue@gmail.com

-

-

 

 

42 Folds to the Moon January 19, 2012

One of my students just can’t wrap his head around the power of exponents.  Can you blame him?  This week we learned that it would take just 27 folds of a piece of paper for the stack to reach the height of Mount Everest, and then just 15 more -a total of just 42 folds - to reach the moon.  As we started the lesson, students guessed “one million” and “47 billion!” folds to reach the moon, so you can imagine the shock (and disbelief) in the actual number 42!  Maybe the weirdest part is to think that it would take 41 of the folds to get just half-way to the moon and then just 1 more to make the second half of the journey. 

-

But how can this be?  How is it possible that a thin sheet of paper easily ripped in half can reach the moon after a mere 42 folds?  Well, let’s see….

-

The simple Algebra 1 exponential growth formula is:

-

-

-

 

-

As the thickness of a piece of paper is roughly 0.01 centimeter, we’d fill in our equation as:

 

 

 

 

-

-

This gives us a very large number of centimeters: (43,980,465,111).

-

Dividing this number by 100 will give us the equivalent number of meters: (439,804,651),

-

and dividing by 1,000 will give us the equivalent number of kilometers:  (439,804).

-

For all us Americans stuck on the Imperial system, 439,804 kilometers is approximately 273,281 miles.  The moon is, on average, 238,855 miles from Earth at any given time, so 42 folds of a piece of paper will actually get us PAST the moon!

-

So how small would the surface area of the top paper on the stack be?  How thin will be this paper tower to the moon?

-

VERY thin!

-

The exponential decay formula is almost exactly the same as the exponential growth formula except that there is a (1 – r) in place of the growth formula’s (1 + r).  To write the equation for how thin this stack of paper to the moon will be, we have to think about a funny occurrence in the stock market…

-

To go from 1 to 2 is a 100% increase:  100% of 1 is added to itself to get 2.

-

But to get back to 1 is a different story:  to go from 2 to 1 is a 50% decrease.  Just 50% of 2 is removed to get to 1.

-

So when your stock goes down 30% on Monday, it’s not back to where it was if it goes back up 30% on Tuesday.  If your stock goes down 50% on Monday, it’s got to go up 100% on Tuesday to get back to where it was.

-

Getting back on track (excuse me, not a fan of Wall Street), our decay equation would be written as:-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

This equation yields the incredibly small number: 6.37 x 10^-12 or .00000000000637 centimeters.  P was set to 28 to because a 9.5×11 sheet of paper is about 28 centimeters long.

-

We didn’t do this last part in class, which is a good thing because all of a sudden I’m having a hard time wrapping my head around exponents!

-

 

If Pigeons can do it, so can you December 24, 2011

Here is a fascinating article on the mathematical intelligence of…. pigeons

(to read full article, click on the pigeons)

-

http://news.discovery.com/animals/pigeons-math-animals-111222.html

-

-

 

Income and Debt with ZeroSum Ruler July 10, 2011

-
One of the ZeroSum ruler’s main purposes is to calculate debt/income problems.   In the problem “I owe you $12 and pay you back just $7. How much do I still owe you?” how do you come to your answer?   Do you count backwards from $12 to $7?   Or do you count forwards from $7 to $12?   No really, how much do I owe you?   How did you figure this out?    The ZeroSum ruler allows the student to count forwards instead of backwards just like we do in real life!    So why do we make our kids count backwards in school?

-

 

Are these searches for real? (Search Terms 6/19/2011) June 20, 2011

My blog keeps track of the search terms that have led people to me.  Some of them make sense.  Other ones?  I always wish that I knew the people who did these searches because I would like to help them with their math questions.  Below is a partial list of search terms from June 19, 2011 and explanations for the people who may have done the searching.  The 7th one down might be worth reading.  Enjoy!

 -

Search Terms Sunday June 19, 2011

“show he pictures of fractions”

What about “she” fractions?

 - -

“show the fraction 16/5 on figures”

Ok, this is a search term I live for.  Somewhere out there is a confused little kid trying to finish his homework, or a mom trying to help her kid finish his homework, and I want to help.  It makes me sad that this kid did not get his answers in class.  So I will attempt to explain “16/5 with figures”!

-

Let’s first start with 1/5:

We have 1/5 because 1 of the 5 slices is green.  Now we need to take 16 of them…

 -

This is extremely messy.  We have so many empty slices (4 of every 5 slices are empty!).  So, let’s condense….-

-

And if we remember that fractions are all about making wholes, we count that we have “three wholes and 1/5 left over” or 3 and 1/5.  Please email me if you need more background or help of any kind!

-

“class”

Thanks!

 -

“zero sum ruler”

You’re in the right place!

-

“show the fraction 16/5 by figures”

I’ve seen this one before…

 -

“the zero sum ruler”

No really, look around!

 -

“math students around the world 2010”

there are!

 -

“blogs on math education failure”

One More to Graduate. Make that 50.000001%

Math manipulatives lead to student failure

 -

“pi the whole number”

Pi is not a whole number.  It’s not even rational.  If your teacher sent you on a quest for information about the whole number pi, tell your teacher that’s her request is an irrational one.

 -

“kathleen fick math”

Who the fick is she??

 -

“math around the world, 1st grade”

They exist too!

 -

“how to use the zero sum rule[r]”

Here’s your answer on YouTube

-

Most of this post is completely unnecessary, but the one about fractions is completely necessary.  I gain [serious] blog-posting inspiration from your search terms, so am looking forward to seeing more tomorrow and being forced to write more about important math why’s!   Thank you! :-)

-

 

Multiplying Fractions with Pictures! June 15, 2011

Fraction Multiplication: Of what?

Fractions are probably the most troublesome topic in Math.  As soon as a problem involves a fraction, kids freeze up.  In Math, of tells us to multiply.  How many shrimp are in five pounds of shrimp?  We multiply the number of shrimp in a pound by five.  Once we know this, fraction multiplication becomes a bit easier to understand.

-

The How of fraction multiplication is easy – multiply the numerators and multiply the denominators.  When we show fraction multiplication with pictures, we need to remember of.

Now to the Why.  To start, we’ll look at a relatively easy problem so that we can develop a pattern to follow with more difficult fraction multiplication problems:

-

(1/2)(1/2)

-

Translated into English, this problem reads “one-half of one-half”.  Here’s a picture of  1/2:

half

-

And the area below in red is “one-half of one-half”:

half of half

-

It’s easy to see that one-half of one-half is (1/4).  And in fact:

-

(1/2)(1/2)   =   1/4

-

Before moving on, let’s look more closely at one aspect of the problem above: the denominator 4.  Where did this come from?  To get that denominator, we needed to keep the entire circle (whole) in mind.  In other words, we needed to say that the red piece was “1 out of something”.  (Confusingly, out of means to divide in Math!)  The denominator is 4 because the red pie piece is 1 out of 4 total pie pieces in the circle.  Always remembering the entire original area is key in fraction multiplication.  Later, we’ll see the same is true with fraction division.

-

To make the denominator easier to see, we can divide the circle twice: first vertically for the first fraction, then horizontally for the second fraction:

half of half 2

-

It’s then easy to see that the overlapped area (numerator) and the entire number of pie pieces in the circle (denominator) create our answer.  This will always be the case.  It wasn’t a coincidence that the denominator was naturally created as we divided the circle twice.  Let’s use this pattern to solve a more complicated fraction multiplication problem:

-

(2/7)(3/5)

-

Because these two fractions do not have a common denominator, it would be hard to divide a circle into 7 (and take 2), then into 5 (and take 3), and analyze the overlapped area.  So instead, we’ll use nice, easy rectangles.  First,  2/7:

2 over 7

-

In the rectangle above, two of the rectangle’s 7 horizontal bars are colored green to represent 2/7.  Now, keeping the whole rectangle in mind, let’s take 3/5:

3 over 5

-

In the rectangle above, three of the 5 vertical columns are colored blue to represent 3/5.  Where to the two colored areas overlap?

-

In the above picture, we can see that the overlapped area consists of 6 purple boxes.  But 6 of what?  Remembering our easy example (1/2)(1/2), where our denominator was the total number of pie pieces in the circle after our two rounds of dividing, let’s count the total number of boxes in the above rectangle.  The total number of boxes is 35.

-

And in fact:   (2/7)(3/5)   =   6/35

-

OLD FASHIONED CHECK: We know that (2/7)(3/5) = 6/35 from the algorithm “multiplying across”.

-

To see this more clearly, we can look at the below picture and see that the area the fractions share, or the overlapped region, is 6 boxes, and the area of the entire region is 35 boxes.  “6 out of 35 boxes are double shaded”.

-

In this last picture we can see that the area of the double shaded region is 6, or (2×3), and the area of the entire region is 35, or (7×5), which is why we multiply the numerators (2×3) and the denominators (7×5) when we find the product of two fractions.

--

Also see Dividing Fractions With Pictures!

-

If this was helpful, here is a free poster download for your classroom:

-

-

Also see Dividing Fractions With Pictures! and Differences of Squares with Pictures!

-

You can download a PDF ebook that uses pictures to explain fraction division, multiplication and addition on CurrClick at Fractions: A Picture Book!

contact blog author Shana Donohue: shanadonohue@gmail.com

-

-

 

Dividing Fractions With Pictures! June 8, 2011

Of all my posts, this one gets the most hits.  I think I know why.  Fraction division seems like it should be simple.  Afterall, ”flip the second fraction and multiply across” is a complete cake walk.  But when we have to explain the process to a kid (or an overly-inflated interviewer), things can go very wrong.  Why is it so hard?  Recently, I met a new friend, Chris Fink, through my blog.  Chris teaches Math in the California penal system.  Through a series of emails back and forth, we both came to a better understanding of this tricky process.  She was able to explain fraction division to her inmates (they all clapped and thanked her - yes, her - afterwards!) and I came to understand how to show the process through pictures a lot better thanks to her.  I left my old post underneath the new stuff because, though wordy, it does give a bit more explanation.  The following three screenshots (you can download the pdf here or by clicking on one of the three screenshots) are a decent start to How we show fraction division thorough pictures.  Thanks Chris!

-

Fraction Division: Not Just a How

Dividing fractions has got to be the algorithm we most often take at face value.  The How – flip the second fraction and multiply across – is easy, while the Why can fill an entire chapter.

-

Whenever we divide, we’re asking “How many groups of this will fit into that?”  With, for example,

-

10 ÷ 2, we’re asking “How many groups of 2 will fit into 10?”  This is easy:

-

Here’s 10:

-

Here’s a group of 2:

-

We can easily see that 5 groups of 2 will fit into 10:

-

Unlike multiplication, division is not commutative.  We cannot divide backward and forwards and expect to get the same result.  For example:

-

10 ÷ 2 ≠ 2 ÷ 10

-

We always “flip the second fraction” in the fraction division algorithm as, contrary to logic, flipping the first fraction instead will not yield the same result.  For example:

The first number in a division problem is simply more important than the second number.  The first number sets the stage while the second number asks, “How many groups of me will fit into your first number?”  In 10 ÷ 2, we weren’t putting groups of 2 into any old number; we were putting groups of 2 into 10.  We needed to keep the 10 in mind as we bundled our groups of 2.  Division with fractions operates in the exact same way.  Whenever a fraction is divided by another fraction, one of two possible outcomes occurs: a fraction less than 1 or a fraction greater than 1.  Of the fractions greater than one, answers can be either whole numbers or mixed numbers.  Whenever we deal with parts of wholes, things get interesting.

-

We’ll start with a simple example where the result is a nice, easy whole number:

-

                                                           

If we ask “How many of the green pie piece will fit into the blue half of the circle?” we can see pretty easily that 3 will fit in perfectly.  If we were to superimpose the green pie over the blue one, the centerlines on both pies would line up nicely, creating a common denominator of 6.  Unfortunately, not all fractions superimpose over each other so nicely.  To develop a pattern that we can use with more difficult fraction division problems, let’s look at 1/2  ÷ 1/6  in a slightly different way.  First, we’ll set the stage with  1/2:

Here we have a circle and we colored half of it.  This next part is where things can get weird.  Remember how, in 10 ÷ 2, the 10 set the stage before we began bundling groups of 2?  If we instead thought about 10 ÷ 2  as  10/1  ÷  2/1 , we can begin to see why this problem was so easy: the 10 and the 2 already shared a common denominator.   Just as we did there, we’ll create a common denominator in this problem.  The easiest way to do this is to superimpose the 1/6′s denominator atop the 1/2 and see what shakes out:

When we divide the entire region into 6 equal pieces, essentially turning  1/2  into 3/6  , it will become very easy to then take  1/6 :

Just like in 10 ÷ 2, we now ask “How many  1/2 fit in  1/6 ?”  In other words, how many green pie pieces fit into the original blue  1/2  ?

3 do.  And in fact,  1/2  ÷  1/6    =   1/2  •  6/1    =    3.

-

Fraction division hasn’t earned its own post based on easy problems like  1/2  ÷ 1/6 .  This problem was easy for a couple reasons: the answer was a whole number and it was very easy to create a common denominator.  Next, let’s look at a slightly harder fraction division problem in a still slightly different way:

This problem is more difficult for a few reasons.  First, the result will not be a whole number.  Second, the result will be a fraction less than one.  Third, the denominators 4 and 6 don’t overlap very easily, so we’ll need to create a common denominator that is larger than both 4 and 6.  We’ll deal with these first two reasons as we work through the problem.  To mitigate the third reason this problem is more difficult, we’ll create a larger common denominator.  Fortunately, this larger common denominator will appear naturally as we begin to draw the problem.

-

First, 3/4 :

-

To show 3/4 , we divided an area into 4 columns and pink-boxed 3 of them.  Keeping the entire area in mind as we have done before, we will now get ready to take 5/6  by first creating 6 rows:

-

and then coloring in 5 of the rows:

-

By using columns to show the first fraction, and rows to show the second fraction, we naturally created a common denominator of 24.  This will happen every time we use the column and row method.

-

Now let’s ask our question: “How many   5/6′s (orange boxes) fit into  3/4 (pink outline) ?”  In other words, how many of the orange boxes from the group of 20 will fit into the pink-boxed 18 area?  So it’s a bit easier to visualize, let’s move as many orange boxes inside as will fit:

-

18 out of the group of 20 orange boxes will fit.  And in fact,  3/4  ÷ 5/6    =    3/4   •  6/5    =    18/20

-

So far we have seen a whole number answer and a fractional answer less than 1.  In this third example, we’ll look at the last type of fraction division problem – one that yields a mixed number.  This next problem was asked of me twice during two different interviews for middle school Math teaching positions in the Boston Public Schools:

Because we’ll need to create a larger common denominator here, as 2 and 3 don’t easily overlap, we will use the column and row method.  Starting with  1/2  :

-

we’ll get ready to take  1/3  by dividing the entire area into 3 equal rows:

-

and coloring 1 of the 3 rows:

-

We see a group of 2 blue boxes.  As we’ve done before, let’s move the one on the outside into the inside:

-

2 of the 2 blue boxes (2/2) will fit into the pink-boxed area.  Additionally, another 1 out of the 2 blue boxes (1/2) will also fit:

And in fact,  1/2  ÷  1/3     =    1/2  •  3/1     =    3/2

-

With the new Common Core Standards, kids are being asked to divide fractions beginning in 5th grade.  As with anything, once we develop a pattern for fraction division, showing the process with pictures becomes easy.  Once a kid can see and feel what is happening in these problems, the process of dividing fractions will begin to make more sense.

-

Please check the comments below for some good additional information on why the division algorithm works.

-

Also see Multiplying Fractions with Pictures!

-

-

-

Also see Multiplying Fractions with Pictures! and Differences of Squares with Pictures!

-

You can download a PDF ebook that uses pictures to explain fraction division, multiplication and addition on CurrClick at Fractions: A Picture Book!

contact blog author Shana Donohue: shanadonohue@gmail.com

-

-

 

 
%d bloggers like this: